Assisting Truck Accident Victims in Obtaining Compensation in Philadelphia 

When a driver is involved in a truck accident, emotions might run high as they try to assess the damage to themselves and their vehicles. However, when a commercial vehicle is involved, many drivers are unaware of who might be held liable, which regulations apply, and what their initial measures should be, regardless of whether they were completely, partially, or not at all at fault. That’s when a Philadelphia truck accident attorney comes into the role. 

Even though the truck driver is entirely to blame for the collision, they may not be held accountable for the damages. Even more perplexing, it’s possible that the corporation they work for, rather than the truck’s owner, is to blame. Understanding the most common causes of truck accidents, on the other hand, is essential. 

And the people and corporations who may be held accountable can assist a victim in navigating the compensation process. 

Laws Concerning Truck Accidents 

Commercial trucks are governed by a plethora of federal laws and regulations. These laws and regulations specify what requirements trucking businesses must meet and what owners and drivers must do to ensure that the big rig is appropriately operated and maintained. These laws can help decide who is held accountable in a trucking accident because of their detailed rules. 

In addition to the federal government, each state has its transportation department, where information can be found more easily. And the people and corporations who may be held accountable can assist a victim in navigating the compensation process. 

Identifying Who is Responsible 

There are numerous players engaged in a truck accident. A tractor-trailer accident can injure the truck driver, the truck owner, the company that leased the truck, the manufacturer, and even the shipper or loader of the truck’s cargo. In some situations, the trucking business or insurance company may use these potential intricacies to limit their liability for the injuries suffered by the victims. 

For example, if the crash was caused by poor loading, the corporation may argue that the shipper is blamed. In other circumstances, it may be argued that the driver’s contract with the firm for which they work spells out how the company is accountable. 

Regarding any losses caused by accidents, on the other hand, such an agreement may not exist, putting the truck driver in charge of the situation. In all circumstances, the victim is the one who suffers throughout the responsibility dispute, as filing for damages with insurance when guilt has not been assigned can be difficult. 

Leave a Reply

Back to top button